Oliver Stone Said That Dems Have Lost All Credibility After Fake Russia Story

Oliver Stone

Famous film Director Oliver Stone believes Democrats’ repeated inquiries into alleged connections between President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Russian government is a “path that leads nowhere.”

Stone had an interview with the Sydney Morning Herald to discuss his latest documentary called The Putin Interviews, about Russian President Vladimir Putin. Stone discussed his experience interacting with the Russian leader and what his documentary aims to convey to a Western audience.

“It’s not a documentary as much as a question and answer session,” he says. “Mr. Putin is one of the most important leaders in the world and in so far as the United States has declared him an enemy – a great enemy – I think it’s very important we hear what he has to say.”

The film will cover Putin’s view of events since he first became president in 2000.

“It opens up a whole viewpoint that we as Americans haven’t heard,” Stone says. “We went to see him four different times over two years.

“I talked to him originally about the Snowden affair, which is in the film. And out of that grew, I think, a trust that he knew that I would not edit it so much.”

How did he find the hardline Russian leader?

“He talks pretty straight,” Stone says. “I think we did him the justice of putting his comments into a Western narrative that could explain their viewpoint in the hopes that it will prevent continued misunderstanding and a dangerous situation – on the brink of war.”

While Stone grew up a Republican with a father who was a stockbroker, his view of the world  changed while serving in combat during the Vietnam War, winning a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart. He reportedly voted for Barack Obama as president in 2008 and 2012 then Green Party candidate Jill Stein last year but strongly refutes claims about Russian influence on the Trump presidency.

“That’s a path that leads nowhere to my mind,” Stone says. “That’s an internal war of politics in the US in which the Democratic party has taken a suicide pact or something to blow him up; in other words, to completely de-legitimize him and in so doing blow up the US essentially.

“What they’re doing is destroying the trust that exists between people and government. It’s a very dangerous position to make accusations you cannot prove.”

One of the subjects that Stone will talk about at Vivid Ideas and Semi Permanent in Sydney next month is the power of film to create change. And despite making many passionate movies about livewire political subjects, he seems pessimistic.

“I’ve done in my own work three Vietnam War films, three presidential type films, one film on Central America, one economics film on Wall Street and so forth,” he says. “And in the matter of war, they’ve had no influence.

“Perhaps some people have recognized the humanity in them in their stance about war and what its meaningless is, especially when it came to Vietnam, but that has not been translated into an argument against Iraq or Libya or Syria or Afghanistan. It’s very frustrating to be a veteran of a war and have America not listening.

“Many people like the films but I don’t know how long they last in the memory. When you’re dealing with the power of the state, which has the propaganda power to repeat and repeat and repeat every day that ‘so-and-so is the enemy and that we’ve got to go to war’, it becomes like a 1984 situation.”

“I think you get appreciated and remembered – sometimes booed, hated, reviled – but at the end of the day, do they remember?” he says. “I wonder. I think a lot of dramatists wonder.”

Amid escalating nuclear tensions with North Korea, Stone says he is disturbed by where recent US attacks on Syria and Afghanistan might lead.

“I’m 70 years old,” he says. “I’ve been around for the Cuban missile crisis. I’ve seen our forces in action in Vietnam.

“I was around for Mr. Reagan’s – people found out later – near-nuclear confrontation in 1983 [when a Soviet early warning system wrongly reported the US had launched intercontinental ballistic missiles]. It came very close to war.

“There have been near accidents all along the way. We felt with the agreements between Gorbachev and Reagan and after the Soviet Union disintegrated that this thing would be over for many of us – a peace dividend that the United States would get off its war footing – but nothing changed.

“The United States is spending on defense and security almost a trillion dollars a year, which is more than all the countries in the world spend on security and the military. It’s inexcusable to people who examine this rationally.”

Stone laments that his latest movie, Snowden, was poorly received in Australia last year. He considers it an important film for attempting to tell the truth about the US intelligence contractor who revealed the extent of covert government surveillance.

And he believes the move towards all-seeing surveillance technology could be a huge mistake.

“I think we’ve had a lot of false information – fake news as they say – used for political ideological purposes,” he says. “In other words, the US has been able, because of this technology, to say without any doubt Russia hacked the election. This is coming from who? From the intelligence agencies that are fighting against Russia with all their hearts and minds.

“They can’t be trusted. This is important to recognize. I think the Snowden movie shows why they cannot be trusted.”

As US federal prosecutors weigh up whether to bring charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, Stone remains a fervent supporter of a man he has visited in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

“For 10 years now he’s been a beacon of integrity and honesty,” he says. “He’s been very helpful to understand the world to those who pay attention.

“Unfortunately his reports sometimes get too thick and too difficult to understand but I don’t think the media has done him any favors really by playing along and accusing him of rape and holding him on these bogus charges. This is scary behavior but it’s also unlawful.”

Assange has been in the embassy since 2012 in order to avoid going to Sweden to face sexual assault allegations.

Stone does not believe claims that individuals one step removed from the Kremlin passed sensitive material to WikiLeaks as part of a Russian plot to influence the presidential election last year.

“I hold Assange in high regard in many issues of state,” he says. “I take very seriously his statement that he received no information from Russia or any state actors.”

Seven years ago, Stone declared he was not optimistic about the US, saying: “The Empire’s in its last days. Babylon will fall.” So how does he feel about the state of his troubled country now?

“If you study my work, you’d understand that I’ve become increasingly alarmed,” Stone says. “As a young man, I was very conservative.

“My father was very much a Republican and I grew up that way. But my life experience has taught me differently. I’ve made films that increasingly reflect that point of view and my fears.

“At the same time, I keep making crime films. I keep making football movies. I mixed it up. I still love movies as movies and I try to make anything I do that has a political bent as exciting as possible.”

Once again, the legendary storyteller is steering a question away from politics.

“Talk about movies,” Stone urges. “Remember I’m a movie director.”

What do you think?

Help spread the truth and share this on Facebook and Twitter along with your comments!

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*