One report released by the Central Intelligence Agency, stating that hackers related to the Russian government gave Julian Assange the Hillary Clinton emails to publish on WikiLeaks, and the media outlets won’t leave this story alone.
Today, Craig Murray, the former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan just destroyed this story with the truth:
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians,” former Ambassador Craig Murray wrote on his blog Monday morning, adding that he had direct access to the original source. “As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks; there is a major difference between the two.”
“Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access.”
The source of the hacks has nothing to do with the revelations that Hillary and the Democrats acted in a corrupted manner.
“If Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie … had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie … had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton Foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence … had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people,” then perhaps she would have won, Murray added.
This was blown way out of proportion by the liberal media to protect Clinton and to shift the blame on Trump illogically.
This was a second time that a former ambassador spoke on the subject.
On Sunday, John Bolton, former US ambassador to America, spoke on CBS News, and old the network that this theory was most likely a “false flag.”
“It is not at all clear to me, just viewing this from the outside, that this hacking into the DNC and the RNC computers was not a false flag operation,” he said, and added that Obama collaborates with the liberal media to keep the story alive and not pay attention to what matters.
On the other hands, Assange and officials in Russia, have simultaneously denied the claims.
“The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia,” The Guardian reported Sunday.
Another outspoken voice about the Russian involvement, Murray And Murray, had something to same this time around as well.
“It is terrible that the prime conduit for this paranoid nonsense is a once great newspaper, the Washington Post, which far from investigating executive power, now is a sounding board for totally evidence free anonymous source briefing of utter bullshit from the executive”, he wrote.
What do you think about this? Share this on Facebook or Twitter along with your comments.